If true, the report’s findings eliminate standing — or the basis for one’s ability to argue a case in front of a court — for the Republican officials’ claims against student debt relief.
Even if the findings by the Roosevelt Institute and Debt Collective weren’t entirely accurate — and there areto rebut them — experts say that it is absurd that the Supreme Court would have taken up the case without any proof of standing from the plaintiffs. “Missouri based much of its argument for standing on the claim that MOHELA would *necessarily* pass along any economic harm from the debt relief program to the state.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more: